What Do You Think of Rafters' Rooftop Patio Proposal?
Rafters Food and Spirits Owner Larry Cramer is proposing to build downtown Stillwater's first rooftop patio. The proposal will go before the planning and heritage preservation commissions next month.
Next month, the Stillwater planning and heritage preservation commissions will take up a proposal to allow Larry Cramer to build a rooftop patio at Rafters Food and Spirits.
If the proposal were to pass through those two commissions with favorable recommendations, downtown’s first rooftop patio would go before the City Council for discussion, and eventually, a vote.
Cramer told the Pioneer Press that the idea of a rooftop patio came when he was eating at Stella's rooftop patio in Uptown and thought: "My view is 10,000 times better than this."
It would be tough to disagree.
But the proposal has also brought opposition.
Stillwater businessman, Patrick Anderson, of Marine Leasing, told WCCO that the rooftop patio creates concerns of safety, burglary, vandalism and noise complaints. He also fears that people will throw things from the rooftop, clog drains, cause a roof to collapse or possibly start a fire.
What do you think of Rafters having a rooftop patio? Leave your thoughts in the comment section and and vote in our poll.
The Heritage Preservation Commission is scheduled to hear the proposal on May 7. The rooftop proposal is set to go before the Planning Commission on May 14. Both meetings will take place at Stillwater City Hall.
Carol Evans
7:22 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Oh give me a break we could all be hit by the trolly car too as it makes it's way around Stillwater. I love the idea! Roof top anything is a great use of space.
Bethany R.
7:58 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
This is the most ridiculous thing I have heard. Vandalism, burglary, safety concerns? Are these concerns with any other outdoor dining space in Stillwater? This is the problem with government, they stop to take a commission vote every time some nut job opens their mouth in opposition about anything. If Anderson voiced concerns of safety because someone may fall over the railing at the Freight House, Pappy's, the Dock or any others, would the planning commission sit down and review their businesses as well? Stick to doing whatever you do Anderson, and quit acting the neighborhood bully!
Peggy Sue
9:49 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Bethany, most of the rooftops downtown have access to the rooftop from inside the building. Many of those buildings have apartments upstairs. Vandalism already is an issue for downtown buildings and break-ins are not uncommon through rooftop access's. And comparing falling from the railing at the Freight House or Pappy's or the Dock is hardly the same as falling from the rooftop of a building.
Randy Marsh
10:21 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Rather than fighting for this roof top dance party USA, I really wish the folks at Rafters would instead focus on doing something about the truly crummy food they serve there. I guess they must be going for the rowdy cheap booze crowd, which is why I would be more hesitant to grant this exception. I do think the reasons Anderson gives are pretty flimsy, but there are people who live in those spaces downtown and should have some protections as well. Also, other than the Freight House is there an establishment anywhere in Stillwater that produces more police visits than Rafters? That should also be a consideration?
Susan
12:04 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
As someone who had to fight a neighboring business because they wanted to have outdoor (amplified) music as late as midnight, I have to say that I see both side. Being as this is downtown and almost entirely commercial (although not completely), I guess my opinion is that they should be able to do it...but believe me when I say that there are usually two very valid arguments for these issues.
limeex2
7:23 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
If successful, there will be others that will want to do it also. Better think of what will happen when the next business asks. I am for any business that actually can survive downtown. As for the food comment by Mr Marsh, "if the shoe fits" Imho Rafters needs food that will bring people up a flight of stairs and come back if you care to have more business.
Shawn Hogendorf
7:29 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
I've heard rumblings of other restaurants downtown that would like to build rooftop patios, too. I don't believe those ideas have reached the point of public hearings yet, though.
Peggy Sue
9:46 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
There are alot of people that live downtown . Granted, they must expect to hear alot of noise when they choose to live down there. But the noise from a rooftop deck will travel blocks late at night! I know because we hear noise from a block away at our house! Also, the issue of kids jumping from one rooftop to another is a very real problem downtown. Just punk kids vandalizing the buildings any way they can. Look at the graffiti at that building that used to be Ruby Begonia's. That bldg. has been a graffiti eye sore for over 10 years! I wonder who is responsible for letting that eye sore slide! There will be alot more of those kinds of problems once kids gain more access to the buildings with rooftop access. More rooftop bars. More noise. Does Stillwater not have enough noise?
David
1:50 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
A lot of these issues have been addressed. If you actually see the plans for the rooftop patio, (on display at rafters) there is almost no possible way for anyone to get from rooftop to rooftop from the proposed patio. There will be a 6 foot rod iron fence along the back wall covered with a black screen mesh which would make it basically non climbable. To the south is where the outdoor bar would be located and to the north another retaining wall so that there is no way to get onto any adjoining rooftops. Not to mention during the day there will always be a min. number of staff up there and at night a min. number of security posted at strategic spots on the patio which would also address any issues with people throwing debris or trying to jump, ( lets be honest, out of all of the patios through out the state show one example of that being an issue). As far as noise, if you go to the city hall meetings it has already been addressed and agreed upon that there can not be any live music or out door music of any kind and noise caused by patron's conversations would be directed out towards the river with the proposed canopy at the west end of the patio which you would also see if you did your homework and saw the plans before attempting to bad mouth the plan. The patio is not an open concept deck the only exposed spots would be the east side (river side).
David
1:50 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
And comparing a rooftop patio at a completely different restaurant to a restaurant that doesn't even exist anymore? how is having a patio on a rooftop with no way of getting on or off except through the actual restaurant going to increase graffiti?? completely unrealistic.
Susan
2:01 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Leave it to our biased city council to now put a ban on any more outdoor music. In the last six years they have approved outdoor (amplified) music in two locations in our neighborhood. Why the change now, Mr. Mayor?
Bethany R.
7:48 am on Monday, April 30, 2012
Peggy, you assume that simply because the patio happens to be on a rooftop that they are letting in teenage punks to run wild over the buildings in Stillwater? Sorry to say, this is absurd. It's a business looking to have an outdoor dining space. Because it happens to be higher in the air than the outdoor dining areas of other businesses in town, doesn't mean that there are any other safety concerns to be had.
Why do all of the naysayers have this assumption that a patio will bring mayhem? They're not proposing a stage to play heavy-metal death music over the valley - they're proposing a place for people to sit and drink and eat a meal. Rooftop patio equals graffiti and people jumping from building to building like Spiderman? Let's get back to reality Peggy Sue.
Gloria K
12:04 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Great idea. The government needs to but out. They have already ruined the century old Lumberjack Days. It seems the counsel is on a power trip and has the need decide on things they know nothing about. Step away and allow the man to make a living. Time to get rid of the "good 'ol boys network. "
Mary-Jo Krenik Gill
12:29 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
I'm all for it! I'm sure any safety concerns will be assessed before approval is given for building permits.
David
1:54 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Yes there has been multiple meetings with various comities and will still be more before approval. People have to understand with the amount of money Mr Kramer is investing in this you think he is going in it half hearted? Not to mention if all safety concerns are not addressed, the lawsuits involved. I just hope everyone is realistic and open minded with the whole project.
Alex Mundy
12:38 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
The Planning and Heritage Preservation Commissions are two of the reasons Stillwater continues to have the historical and aesthetic appeal that draws people and their disposable income to town. Let's not be so short-sighted as to have an "anything goes" attitude that creates more ugly additions and buildings that don't fit the character of the town.
As for Rafters' request, consider the clientele. It's a distinctly different crowd than Marx, Reve 324, The Dock, The Green Room, Shanghai Bistro, Nacho Mama's or Smalley's. Drinking, not dining, is the attraction at Rafters. It's one thing to fall off your bar stool. It's another thing to fall off the roof.
Kelly J
1:07 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Consider the clientele?? So anyone not patronizing Reve, Marx or the Green Room is falling off their barstools? Get real. The beauty of Stillwater is that there’s something for everyone not just those of certain socioeconomic status. Unbelievable.
Alex Mundy
1:23 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
It has nothing to do with socioeconomic status, Kelly. It has to do with behavior. There are patrons of Rafters who go there to drink for one purpose -- to get drunk. And those are the people who are responsible for the fights, the disturbances, the police calls and the vomit on the sidewalks on Sunday morning. Is that the "beauty of Stillwater" that you want residents to put up with so you can party on the roof?
Alex Mundy
2:13 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
It's simple math, daivd. The more people drinking, the greater the likelihood of putting drunk people on the streets. Since you seem to be intimately familiar with Mr. Kramer and his plans, perhaps you could tell us what percent of income Rafters derives from alcohol vs. food. If the plan is to sell more food than booze, I agree with Randy -- you better do something about the food.
David
2:31 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
i have no idea the ratio. this discussion is on the merits of adding a rooftop patio not quality of food or lack there of, ( which i think is rather good.) every issue brought up in these discussions has or is being addressed. if you think the ratio unfavorable than this patio (among other changes) seeks to fix that. a rooftop patio with such a small capacity wont bring in a comparable amount more people than already are downtown on any given late night, therefore wont add a noticeable amount of drunk street wanderers at the end of the night. if anything it might bring some new curious diners into town looking for a nice view while enjoying some diner and a glass of wine.
Alex Mundy
2:50 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
I think part of the discussion should be whether more of a bad thing is good. I have a problem with the expansion, rooftop or otherwise, of a business that's based primarily on liquor sales with enough mediocre bar food thrown in to make it seem like a restaurant. Let's not base the decision on the pipe dreams of someone who doesn't have a track record of producing the kind of "dining" experience that would bring anyone back for a second visit.
Kelly J
12:51 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
It's a fantastic idea. Stillwater is a beautiful town with only a few outside venues that allow for unobstructed views of the St. Croix. Those venues are often full to capacity which would indicate people would like more of them. To assume that a roof top patio will lead to more robbery, vandalism and people jumping off of buildings is ludicrous.
Mark Halterman
1:01 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Mark H. - Kathy's pub in Rochester has a similiar layout to Rafter's and they also have a roof top bar that is absolutely faboulous. They have no issues with items thrown off buildings and any other negative's mentioned in this article. Stillwater seems like a great location for a bar with a rooftop offering.
Matt
2:52 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Harrumph! Harrumph! We should re-evaluate all establishments and close any that exceed the puke-on-sidewalk monthly ratio! Harrumph! Additionally, there will no doubt be dancing and bodies in close proximity on the proposed rooftop! And the high fence will allow men and unmarried women to fornicate in the corner! We shall not let this continue lest their souls be damned for eternity! Harrumph!
Alex Mundy
3:05 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Does anyone know the Heineken maneuver? Matt seems to be choking on sarcasm.
Susan
3:05 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
If they sincerely want this for outdoor dining, then it should be as simple as closing the patio when the kitchen stops serving dinner, say 10pm. Problem solved.
Ben Grose
4:25 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
David,
Smalley's is better
Thank you.
Randy Marsh
4:27 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Can somebody tell me if the current ownership/management is the same folks that have been involved with the previous bar/restaurant(s) that have occupied the space? Perhaps the incoherent guy who can't seem to spell David can respond. Thanks.
David
5:05 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
sorry randy, i am typing this on my phone so its hard to review it and edit but no its a different owner. lets not resort to personal attacks.
Anonymous
8:59 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
Randy, have you been to the "Fighthouse" lately? They cause 10 times the amount of police calls, which is why they are stationed there at bar close every weekend. If food and view are an issue, the Freighthouse should have been closed years ago for charging $13 to sit on a patio and a mediocre burger.
jeff
4:18 pm on Thursday, May 31, 2012
No way to roof top!!! This place is a joke. Just walked through with my family and couldn't get anyone to help us, plates with food left on them that looked liked they have been their for a month were everywhere, and could barely walk on the sticky floor.. The place is gross along with the food. Give the patio to a buisness of some meaning! Oh and the bartender was a complete ass. Short balding guy wearing a cap!