.

Dayton Sets March 15 Deadline on House Approval of St. Croix River Crossing Project

If legislation to exempt the St. Croix River Crossing Project from the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act is not passed by the House and signed into law by March 15, MnDOT will be forced to repurpose the funds now set aside for that project, Dayton said Tuesday.

Gov. Mark Dayton said Tuesday that congressional action to pass a bill authorizing the construction of the St. Croix River Crossing Project must be taken before March 15, or the state will not be able to provide funding for the project.

The Senate unanimously passed Sen. Amy Klobuchar’s bill on a voice vote last month. It currently awaits action by the House of Representatives to exempt the project from the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.

“If this legislation is not passed by the House and signed into law by March 15, the Minnesota Department of Transportation will be forced to repurpose the funds now set aside for that project to other priority projects in Minnesota,” a letter Gov. Dayton’s wrote to Rep. Michele Bachmann reads.

Bachmann’s House version of that bill, H.R. 850, passed out of the House Committee on Natural Resources on Oct. 5.

“I was previously advised that it would be taken up on the House floor shortly after Congress reconvened in January; however, to date, no action appears to have been taken,” Dayton wrote.

Federal and state appropriations for transportation project expire if the funds are not spent on actual projects by certain dates, Dayton said. MnDOT originally set a deadline of Nov. 15 as a date for federal approval for the project, so the department could meet those requirements.

At Dayton’s urging, the deadline was extended.

However, MnDOT has informed Dayton that work on the project must commence by March 15 to complete it within the deadlines of those funds.

Bachmann, McCollum React

In a statement, Bachmann said she had a “great conversation” with Dayton today and she “remains committed to seeing this legislation passed and signed into law.”

“Unfortunately,” Bachmann said, “Governor Dayton's deadline of March 15 fails to recognize that the House of Representatives is only in session for eight days between now and March 15, with much of Congress' attention going to the surface transportation bill during that time.”

Bachmann said getting the St. Croix River Crossing Project through Congress is her “top priority. “I remain absolutely committed to seeing the project through to completion.”

Rep. Betty McCollum—who after today’s redistricting maps were drawn—will now represent the Stillwater area said Dayton’s letter is a signal that it is time to take Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood up on his offer of a working group and come to the table to reach a compromise.

“Governor Dayton is right that the burden of passing this legislation squarely rests with Congresswoman Bachmann,” McCollum said in a written statement. “It’s doubtful this flawed bill will pass the House on the Governor’s timeline. I will continue working for a more fiscally-responsible, appropriately-scaled replacement bridge for Stillwater.”

But Dayton said if new bridge designs or routings are to be considered, the project will have to return to the beginning of the process—including new state and federal environmental impact assessments, new design and engineering studies.

“Such a restart would most likely consign any new bridge to another decade of debate, with no assurance of a better outcome at the end,” Dayton said.

In a written statement, Stillwater Mayor and Coalition for the St. Croix River Crossing Co-chair Ken Harycki thanked Dayton for his “unequivocal support.”

“We understand the Governor’s insistence that this project move forward now, because we share the same urgency,” Harycki said. “We have never been closer to getting this bridge built. The future of our region is too important; too much time and money have been invested, and too many jobs are on the line for us to not succeed.

“We know that the strong bi-state and bi-partisan support for this project will help us meet Dayton’s deadline of March 15 and will allow the St. Croix River Valley to celebrate an important victory and avoid another generation of gridlock, pollution and public safety risks.”

Another Lobbyist Request

Tonight, the Stillwater City Council will consider contracting lobbyist services for the St. Croix River Crossing Project.

But a group of Stillwater residents opposed to the “boondoggle” bridge, named the “NO 700 MILLION DOLLAR BRIDGE” group, are also planning to approach the City of Stillwater for lobbying money.

Stillwater resident Donald Empson, a spokesperson for the group, said for a democracy to function effectively, the voters must know all points of view on an issue.

"On one hand, many of the proponents of the big bridge stand to make lots of money if the bridge is built," Empson said. "The bankers get more customers; the realtors get more properties to sell at higher prices; the unions get jobs and more union dues, so it is in their self interest to finance a lobbying effort, and present only their facts.

"On the other hand, those opposed to the big bridge, have to make due with what comes out of their pocket with no expectations of future profits," he continued. “For this reason, to make a level playing field, we have decided to ask the City to fund a lobbyist to work against the big bridge so that the voters can learn both sides of the bridge issue.

“For reasons best known to the Mayor, the city is committed to giving our taxpayer money to those lobbying for the new bridge. It is only right the City also give lobbying money to the opposition so all viewpoints and all the facts are thoroughly explored. I am sure the Mayor is committed to the democratic process and will see the logic of our request.”

Those who wish to contact the opposition group can do so at no700milliondollarbridge@gmail.com. Those who would like to sign a petition "urging a smaller, more environmentally friendly bridge" can sign a petition here.

mainstreet February 22, 2012 at 02:30 AM
First I heard Betty now has Stillwater in her district. Hopefully they can help put her to pasture.
Jim February 22, 2012 at 02:43 AM
Get to know Betty before hopeing she is unelected. Her opposition of the behemoth, ugly, safety hazard to boaters, upsetting to the riverbed, ultra expensive, bridge to nowhere across Lake St Croix, MnDOT designed bridge is warrented. First the NEW Wacota bridge develops cracks and has to be cabled together, then the I35W bridge falls, then a pedestrian bridege over the Hiawatha LRT and Hiawatha Ave fails. Can we trust MnDOT to design a safe bridge, I think NOT!!
Susan February 22, 2012 at 02:44 AM
The city is once again spending massive amounts of unbudgeted money for lobbyists. Since 1992 the city has spent $871,000 on lobbyists. They just upped the ante tonight and voted to go from paying lobbyists $1500 per month to $15,000 per month for the mega bridge. Even though the governor has put a do or die date on this thing of March 15, the city is writing the contract (for $15,000/month) to be renewable each month!
Susan February 22, 2012 at 02:58 AM
Living in Stillwater, I am thrilled to make the swap!
mainstreet February 22, 2012 at 03:18 AM
I don't think MnDot designed any of those bridges. They have contractors do that (very poor ones obviously). As for Betty, she was the speaker at my daughter's graduation back in the 90's. She nauseated me so badly back then I wanted to puke, and that was before I started leaning right!
Randy Marsh February 22, 2012 at 06:06 AM
The odds don't appear very good for the House to take up this issue before March 15. Stillwater would have been better off saving its money at this point because it will do nothing to beat the deadline, which has already been extended several months. With any luck, MnDOT and others will take this opportunity to find a less expensive solution rather that does not violate federal law.
D. Knutson February 22, 2012 at 01:59 PM
This no more than political grandstanding by the Democrats and playing to their base.  For something that has been delayed by the various opposition groups numerous times, putting it on a timeline ultimatum is ludicrous.   The timing of it to coincide with the announcement of redistricting is no accident, it's simply political posturing.  For you wanting a smaller bridge, MNDOT has said numerous times that their is no proof the smaller bridge you are stumping for is significantly cheaper.  Plus it would require numerous studies resulting in years of delays, which is what you REALLY want.  Ultimatums rarely work, and Dayton should have learned his lesson last year when he shut down the state and got nothing in return for his "posturing".  MNDOT does not design bridges, engineering firms do.  MNDOT reviews, oversees, maintains according to engineering specifications, and facilitates all bridge related activities, but they don't engineer or design them.  So blaming MNDOT for bridge failures is another diversionary ploy.  Most of the MNDOT employees are union members, which typically support the same liberalistic ideals that you bridge opposers have, but you are ripping them..... Interesting isn't it. 
Susan February 22, 2012 at 02:05 PM
If I have this figured correctly, and count the two Saturdays and Sundays - Stillwater will be spending over $900 a day to lobby for this bridge. Conach will still be receiving about $50/day, and the two new lobbyists will be getting $15,000 over the next seventeen days - $882.35/day. Wilhelmi claims that he will be working on different issues when double dipping from the Coalition group, and getting paid by the city at the same time, but it is clear there has to be some overlap. I am so tired of this mayor's friends reaping the financial rewards of having their buddy in office. Anyone who dares take a cheap shot at our current political leaders (EITHER SIDE) in Washington would be a huge hypocrite if then turning around and supporting our mayor and his form a governing.
Hudsoner February 22, 2012 at 05:51 PM
@ D. Kundson, Even though I am with you concerning the bridge construction, I dislike very much your badmouthing of union workers (I am not one and never have been one) and their possible political view point (how do you know what that is?). I feel the bridge has nothing to do with party politics, because prominent Republicans and Democrats support it, and I would appreciate it very much, if you would leave politics out of the discussions!
Randy Marsh February 22, 2012 at 07:14 PM
You do realize this same deadline was put in place last fall so that the state can adequately plan for other needed projects and Dayton was more than reasonable in pushing this deadline back several months because it appeared the bridge supporters were making progress. This doesn't look like grandstanding or playing to his base to me, unless you consider his base the 99.9 percent of Minnesota that could care less whether this bridge goes up. Also, I think it's pretty clear that Dayton was the one who caved in the budget impasse while the GOP was willing to let the the government shutdown go on indefinitely. At least that's my centrist view.
Micheal Foley February 22, 2012 at 09:35 PM
A day after Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton threatened to pull funding if Congress didn't act by March 15, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker urged lawmakers to step on it. Read Walker's full statement: http://patch.com/A-rcCd
Jim February 23, 2012 at 03:58 AM
The new I35W bridge was constructed without decades of delays. Last summer a railroad bridge washed out in the north metro and a new bridge was constructed in 3 DAYS!! Hire that contractor to build the Stillwater bridge. MnDOTs contracting practices are FAILED, how can they be competent with a failed Wacota bridge, a failed I35W bridge, a failed pedestrian bridge. A friend who worked for MnDOT says the bridge inspectors hired by MnDOT are not competent, explains a lot now doesn't it? Make you feel comfortable crossing any bridge, don't it?
D. Knutson February 23, 2012 at 01:51 PM
@hudsoner What you insinuate is bad mouthing union workers is simply pointing out the facts.  If you aren't aware that unions, and opposition groups who are fighting the bridge, all financially support the liberals political party, you probably want to get up to speed.   The unions that state employees belong to openly lobby their membership to fund and support the Democratic Party in Minnesota, this is a fact regardless if you like it or not.   Other opposition groups that have fought the bridge openly support the Democrats,  in fact Frankin  met with the environmental groups before he voted to hear them out, but even though he voted to approve the bill, he's not openly pushing for it.  You still don't think this is a partisan politics issue?   McCollum is openly lobbying Democrats on the state and federal levels to vote against and fight the bridge, and you want me to keep the politics out of it?  They politicized this issue years ago, I'm just pointing out the facts. 
Shawn Hogendorf February 23, 2012 at 10:48 PM
Here's what Bachmann told MPR today about Dayton's deadline: "I've continued to speak with our leadership about this issue and we intend to move forward so whatever measures we need to make, we will make," Bachmann said. "Gov. Dayton told me that he would be happy to work on a letter with himself and [Wisconsin Gov. Scott] Walker in support of this bridge. I think the House Republican leadership knows that everyone's on board with this bridge. It's a matter of the legislative timetable." Here's a link to their post: http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/02/21/stillwater-bridge/
Mark witte March 05, 2012 at 11:40 PM
Interstate 94 is 5 miles south of 36. There are highways going north and south along the the St.croix that connect 36 to 94 from oak park to Afton. I don't know what highways run north and south in Wisconsin but I know they are there. Both sides could improve those highways and still keep the old Stillwater bridge. The turnoffs for 94 would be quicker and better for rail service. Most of the traffic is Wisconsin people working in Minnesota so they should pay for it or make it a toll bridge.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »