.
Feedback

What's That Noise?: St. Croix River Crossing Load-Testing Underway

Has the load-testing portion of the St. Croix Crossing Project impacted you? Are you losing sleep over it? Annoyed by the sound? Or are you just happy to hear the sounds of progress? Tell us about it in the comments.

The of the St. Croix Crossing Project has now entered its second week.

Crews from last week to perform load-tests, which will provide bridge designers with critical information on soil conditions under the river.

“This is a very important part of the project for us as we learn exactly what is under the water and what we need to do to build the extradosed bridge,” MnDOT spokesperson Mary McFarland Brooks said.

Load testing is expected to last throughout the summer.

Tomorrow is the last scheduled open house date to learn more about the project, as staff from both states will answer questions and share the project schedule.

The open house will take place from 4:30-6:30 p.m., at the Bayport Library. 

MnDOT will also be hosting a meeting in Stillwater on June 21 to discuss the . That meeting will be held from 4-7 p.m. at .

Click here to read other Patch coverage about the St. Croix River Crossing.

You can follow MnDOT communications about the project on the St. Croix Crossing website by clicking here, or “like the St. Croix Crossing Facebook page.

Old Mort June 13, 2012 at 01:40 pm
I still think this bridge is way over priced. Did you read that the new Hastings bridge was going to be built for $120 million? Stillwater $700 million.. Doesn't make sense.
Jim Bob June 13, 2012 at 02:19 pm
It's interesting when people compare bridge prices. People compare the Stillwater bridge to the 35W bridge and say the Stillwater bridge is way too high. Martin is saying that comparing it to the Hastings bridge. The new Stillwater bridge will be 2-3 times longer than the Hastings bridge. The 35W bridge is much shorter than the Hasting bridge and has existing approaches.
It's not an apples to apples comparison.
Carbon Bigfuut June 13, 2012 at 02:34 pm
The Stillwater bridge cost is only 290-300 million.The remainder of the 690 mil. is for roadway construction, which doesn't apply to the bridges in Minneapolis or Hastings.
Frank McGruber June 13, 2012 at 02:51 pm
@Martin Greis:
Your train of thought doesn't make sense. What's your basis for comparison?
Jim June 13, 2012 at 03:13 pm
Would the "roadway construction" be needed unless there was a bridge being constructed?
IF the Stillwater bridge wasn't a MILE LONG the cost would be way less. According to Bechtel Corp (builders of many bridges) the cost of a bridge is determined by the number of square feet of bridge deck. The MILE LONG bridge over Lake Saint Croix is 3/5ths more expensive than a bridge over the narrows north of Stillwater. So a 5,000 foot long "extradosed" bridge over Lake Saint Croix is about $300,000,000 more than a 2,000 foot bridge over the Saint Croix RIver. Furthermore, do you remember all the dirt work needed for the reconstruction of highway 36 in North Saint Paul? Well even with all that dirt work that entire project cost about $29,000,000. Very sad this mile long "extradosed" bridge is needed, extradosed is new bleeding edge technology, over Lake Saint Croix when a 2,000 foot suspension bridge could be constructed for $300,000,000 less. The negatives associated with constructing a mile long bridge over Lake Saint Croix keep pileing up, (deep silt on the bottem, farmland taken from long time farmers, OPH costs, OPH traffic woes, OPH business impacted, environmental impact on Lake Saint Croix, risk to boat traffic with the proposed bridge, view from Stillwater obstructed by the proposed bridge ETC) yet the project WILL NOT STOP!!
Old Mort June 13, 2012 at 03:35 pm
Say what you want...the bridge could've been built for a whole lot less in a different location no thanks to our "Blow all your money quicker than you can earn it", congress woman Michele Bachmann. I hope the people in her district do not re-elect her.
Jim Bob June 13, 2012 at 03:52 pm
Martin, did you feel the same about Ms. Bachmann before she single-handedly made the new bridge a reality? Or did your feelings spring directly out of the approval of the bridge?
Old Mort June 13, 2012 at 11:11 pm
Sue: No, I watched Michele Bachmann during her run for the republican nominee for president and only then (in my opinion) did I realize what a dunce she was. She was an embarrassment to Minnesota...whether it be her comments about the other nominees, Obama or any other subject she arrived at. Her husband changing gay people into straight people is a good indication of how she thinks.... She is kind'a cute and that is what got her elected. Intelligence wise...oh boy...I talked to her once and walked away feeling how in the hell did she get where she is today. So, yes Sue, I've felt that way about her long ago. Way before the bridge was okayed. She is the quintessential congress woman who doesn't give a damn about the amount of money or the reason it is being spent. Hope that answers your question. Perhaps you should go to youtube and see for yourself how bright mrs bachmann really is.
Old Mort June 13, 2012 at 11:24 pm
Oh, and Sue...she didn't single handedly push that bridge through congress. She had a lot of help from the Wisconsin congress people and of course there was Governor Dayton, Klochubar and good old Al Frankin who would do anything to please any potential voter. I voted for all these people with the exception of Bachmann but will not vote for any of them again. Dayton, who wossed out with his little duel with the republicans cost us our property tax refunds...We, most likely on account of him will never see the likes of any refund again...then when it came to the Vikings...oh, gee we weren't as broke as we thought we were...let's give the Vikes all they need to stay in Minnesota...to hell with the refunds for people who are about to have to move because they cannot afford the taxes...THANK YOU GOV DAYTON!
Susan June 14, 2012 at 12:33 am
"Single-handedly"? Sorry, I don't think so. Amy Klobuchar has just as much, if not more, to do with lobbying those in DC, along with a couple governors, senators, congressmen, etc. Please don't make Rep. Bachmann out to be any more than she is, or is not.
Jim June 14, 2012 at 02:04 am
Martin, you are on the wrong side of this issue. If you continue to post facts out here you may be called a SPAMMER!!
Susan June 14, 2012 at 02:09 am
Stop it, Jim!
Jim June 14, 2012 at 02:19 am
OK, it's time to call it a day anyway.
Be back tomorrow.
Old Mort June 14, 2012 at 12:18 pm
That's okay by me, Jim. I'm all through here...you and your other Bachmann lovers can have it all to yourselves...
Shawn Hogendorf (Editor) June 14, 2012 at 01:07 pm
Jim's account has been suspended until he agrees to move the conversation forward and be respectful of other Patch users.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Stillwater Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Susan June 19, 2013 at 03:35 pm
Although it seems to not be the best use of our police officer's time, calling the police seems toRead More be the answer. In our neighborhood, we have been told time and time again by the city council, that they don't know if there is a problem, or how frequent that problem is, unless citizens call the police. Now, whether you can get the police to do something about it, is a completely different subject as most shrug you off as if you are nothing more than an annoying gnat. It would certainly be nice if the city would consider some sort of written complaint procedure.